Is Online Learning as Good as Face-to-Face Learning?
Is Online Learning as Good as Face-to-Face Learning?
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Is Online Learning as Good as Face-to-Face Learning?
In the contemporary world, advancement in technology has modified the learning environment. Education was predominantly delivered in the confinement of a classroom in the past. However, owing to the lifestyles and availability of internet communication devices such as smartphones and personal computers, students are increasingly enrolling in online courses. Academic institutions also embrace the trend in order to meet both the demand and interests of learners. Accordingly, there is a need to establish whether online education is as effective as the traditional face-to-face type of pedagogy. Although face-to-face learning enables interactions among students and educators, e-learning is equally good not only for its convenience and flexibility but also because learners show similar or better performance.
Online learning is easily accessible. Typically, in the face-to-face format, students travel to their academic institutions to attend classwork. However, traveling raises transportation issues. Jaggars claims that most learners live a long distance from the school and do not possess a car or have to share one (6). Even though some have or share a vehicle, the frequent trips to campus require a person to purchase gasoline, which is costly. In contrast, provided that a student has access to the internet, they can engage with their instructors online at the comfort of working at home or from any geographic location (Jaggars 7). Thus, online learning reduces transport cost and enables students to access education from any location.
Electronic learning also allows flexibility. While some students are employed on a full-time basis, others have unpredictable schedules working either during the day or at night. Some learners have other responsibilities such as parenting (Jaggars 6). Owing to the busy scheduling, it is inevitable that the students should enroll in online courses to pursue their profession. Furthermore, a group of learners believes that a lot of time is wasted in face-to-face classes either because of the instructor’s choices or disruption caused by other students (Jaggars 7). Kemp and Grieve also pose that students prefer to complete learning activities online at their own time (5-6). Accordingly, the busy schedules necessitate people to learn through the internet.
Ultimately, students show similar performance in both settings. Most studies establish that there is no significant difference between students’ achievement in the face-to-face and online learning formats. For instance, Nguyen reveals that about 92% of all the studies, investigating the research topic, pose that e-learning is as effective as or better than face-to-face format (315). On one hand, learners report that they are able to provide good results when they experience student-to-student and instructor-to-student interactions. Others believe that e-learning encourages self-directed learning resulting in better achievements (Kemp & Grieve 8). Nonetheless, the studies reveal that learners achieve well in both settings.
Learning through the internet is as good as the face-to-face form of education. While face-to-face format necessitates students to attend classroom, e-learning reduces the frequency of visiting the academic institutions and lessens transportation costs. Moreover, some learners have other responsibilities such as parenting and working. Online learning offers a flexible schedule enabling people to attend to other activities and embark on learning at their own convenience. Ultimately, studies concerning the difference between learner’s performances in the two cases establish either equivalent or better achievement in online learning as compared to face-to-face format. Thus, e-learning is as good as face to face learning.