Justify why the problem and your nursing intervention should be a priority.

Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 1:Community Windshield SurveyPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to complete a direct observational assessment of a community in your area. This windshield survey will be the initial step in uncovering a community health problem in your area and identifying community dynamics. This problem will be further assessed in the following two assignments.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO2: Assess the health needs of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities using demographic and epidemiological data to identify population health risks. (PO 4)Due DateSubmit to the appropriate basket in the Dropboxby 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 2.Points:150 pointsDirections1.Download the NR443 Community Windshield Survey form from Doc Sharing. You will type your name and answers directly onto this Word document. Your form does not need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use a professional writing style with complete sentences, accurate grammar, and correct spelling. If references are used, they must be cited in the text and the complete reference should be included in the reference box in APA format. References are optional.2.Watch Caring for Populations project overview and Milestone 1 tutorial by clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/18654d31-5a82-40bd-83fe-6e1cc86876e5/1/NR443_CH_CourseProject_Milestone_1_overview.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 2 Assignments page.3.Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name to the file name; for example, NR443 Windshield Survey Form_Smith.4.Submit the completed form to the Caring for Populations: Community Windshield Survey Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2.5.Length: The completed form should be three to four pages in length (not including any optional references).GuidelinesBelow are the requirements needed for successful completion of the Windshield Survey Form.1.Introduction to the Community:Identify the community you will be using for this assignment with the city and state and provide a brief one paragraph description of the community. Your community should be the area where you live or the area surrounding your work setting. The community must include a residential area and be broad enough to answer the survey questions. You do not need demographic data.2.Windshield Survey: Assess your community by doing a windshield survey.Information about the components of a windshield survey is located in your textbook, Nies & McEwen (2015) on page 98 (Box 6-2). Drive through the area and report your observations by describing each of the following six areas using a majority of the questions from each category of Box 6-2 as your guide (one to two in depth paragraphs for each category). Be sure to include what you observed related to each of these categories, and also include any significant items that are missing in your community because this may be equally important in identifying a community health problem.a. Community vitalityb. Indicators of social and economic conditionsc. Health resourcesd. Environmental conditions related to healthe. Social functioningf. Attitude toward healthcareNote: It is helpful to conduct this assessment at least two different times: during the day or evening, on a weekday and/or on the weekend. If possible, plan on asking someone to drive during your survey so that you can take notes.3.Conclusion: Provide a summary of your findings. Describe significant community health problems based on your observations. The information gathered during the windshield survey should assist you to identify community health problems that will be further assessed in the next assignment.4.References: The purpose of this assignment is to document your observations of your community. Outside sources are not required. However, if sources are used, these sources must be cited within the form (Author, year) and listed in the reference section in APA format (see APA category in Course Resources for help with formatting).Best Practices in Completing the FormThe following are best practices in preparing this project. Make sure all elements of the form are included. Review directions and grading rubric below thoroughly. Cite any outside references as above (these are optional). Use a professional writing style with complete sentences. Proofread prior to final submission. Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Community Windshield Survey (150 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor, failing, or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsIntroduction of Community20 pointsCommunity identified and briefly described(1820 points)Community identified but description is missing(1617 points)Community identification and description are insufficient(15 points)Community not identified or described(014 points)/20Windshield Survey100 pointsCommunity assessed: findings adequately cover the six criteria listed(92100 points)Assessment of 12 of the criteria is missing or inadequate(8491 points)Assessment of 34 of the criteria is missing or inadequate(7683 points)Windshield survey not completed or criteria not followed(075 points)/100Conclusion20 pointsConclusion sufficient and includes brief summary of windshield survey findings and identification of community health problems(1820 points)Conclusion lacks brief summary of findings orproblem identification(1617 points)Conclusion lacks brief summary and problem identification(15 points)Conclusion not completed(014 points)/20Mechanics10 pointsNo more than two grammar or spelling errors; writes logically in complete sentences(10 points)Three errors of any type(89 points)Four errors of any type(67 points)More than four errors of any type(05 points)/10Total Points:/150eek 4Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 2:Assessment and DiagnosisPurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an opportunity to utilize community assessment strategies, uncover a community health problem, and identify the components of one community health nursing problem related to the community dynamics.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO2: Assess the health needs of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities using demographic and epidemiological data to identify population health risks. (PO 4)CO6: Utilize a systems-based and collaborative approach to address factors that influence the health of a community and population health problems. (PO 2)Due DateSubmit to the appropriate basket in the Dropboxby 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 4.Points:225 pointsDirectionsWatch the Milestone 2 tutorialby clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/57f18443-dc92-4a70-8095-3cf3dc7338b5/1/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.zip/NR443_CH_Milestone_2_tutorial.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 4 Assignments page.This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in length (not including the title page and reference list). Below are the requirements for successful completion of this paper. Please use the following categories as the first level headings on your paper. See the documents in the APA category in Course Resources for assistance with APA formatting. [Introduction:] This beginning of your paper should catch the readers attention with interesting facts about your community and shouldinclude the purpose statement of the paper. This should be one paragraph. APA states that you should not title this as introduction; however, you are still expected to write a separate introduction. The title of the paper should be repeated at the top of page two and centered. Community Overview: Identify the community that you are assessing by name and state and provide a general description of the community. What is the general character of the community? Statistics should not be included here. Your community should be the area you live or work in and should include a residential area. It should be a large enough area to answer the questions in the text. This should be one paragraph. Demographic Data: Compile a range of demographic (population description) data for your community by examining U.S. Census Bureau reports. Using this data, describe your community. Compare your community data to state or national data. A summary of this data should be no more than two paragraphs. Epidemiological Data: Compile and summarize a range of epidemiological (illness, morbidity, and mortality) data for your community by examining data from sources such as city or county health department reports, County Health Rankings (countyhealthrankings.org), or the Centers for Disease Control to describe priority health problems in your area. See the Webliography for applicable sites to search. Compare your community to state or national data. This comparison will help to identify a priority community health problem specific to your community. A summary of this data should be no more than two paragraphs. Windshield Survey: Provide a summary of your observations from your first milestone. Make sure to discuss observations related to your identified problem. This should be one to two paragraphs. Problem Diagnosis:o Using the assessment data, identify one community health nursing problem that you consider to be a priority concern.o Relate your choice to one of the Healthy People 2020 specific numbered objectives (not just a goal). Healthy People objectives are located within a topic area under the Objectives tab.o Your rationale should also include why this is a problem in your community and factors that contribute to the problem. Avoid discussion of interventions in this milestone.o Include a discussion of your problem with information from at least two scholarly sources (such as professional journal articles).(Review the documents in the APA category in Doc Sharing for help in determining sources that are considered scholarlyhint, .com websites are not considered scholarly sources). This should beno more than three paragraphs. Summary: Summarize your community assessment and diagnosis findings and include a brief statement about the problem and the major factors that contribute to this problem. This information should be no more than two paragraphs. Reference Page: All references should be cited within the paper and should be included on the reference page.Guidelines Application: Use Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) to create this assignment. Use the categories above as APA headings for the sections of your paper. Length: This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in length (not including the title page and reference list). Submission: Submit your file via the basket in the Dropbox: Milestone 2 Assessment and Diagnosis, by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 4. Scholarly Writing: APA format is required. Review APA documents in the APA category in Course Resources and use the free resources of SmartThinking for writing tutors. Save your paper with your last name in the document title (e.g., Smith Assessment and Diagnosis). Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions.Best Practices in Preparing the PaperThe following are best practices in preparing this project. Complete the demographic, epidemiologic, and windshield survey prior to choosing a problem to focus on. Choose one nursing problem specific to your community. Make sure all elements of the paper are addressed and headings for each category are included. Review directions thoroughly. Cite all sources within the paper as well as on the reference page. Proofread prior to final submission. Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Use the A column of the rubric below to ensure that you have included all the needed elements. Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy. The paper must be your original work. Once submitted to the Dropbox, check back to ensure that your Turnitin similarity index is less than 24%, if not revise and resubmit prior to the deadline.Grading Rubric: Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis (225 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsIntroduction10 pointsIncludes the purpose of the paper and catches the readers attention with interesting facts(910 points)Missing purpose of paper or hook(8 points)Missing purpose of paper and hook(7 points)Introduction missing(06 points)/10Community Overview20 pointsCommunity identified and adequately described(1820 points)Community identified but description is inadequate(16 points)Community identified but description is missing(15 points)Community not identified or described(014 points)/20Demographic Data30 pointsDescribes a range of demographic data about your community from U.S. Census Bureau reports with comparisons to state or national data(2830 points)Adequate demographic data described but missing state or national comparison(2527 points)Little demographic data and missing state or national comparisons(2324 points)Lacks demographic data and missing state or national comparisons(022 points)/30Epidemiological Data (Disease or health behavior rates)30 pointsDescribes a range of epidemiological data about community fromappropriate reports with comparisons to state or national data(2830 points)Adequate epidemiological data described but missing state or national comparison(2527 points)Little epidemiological data and missing state or national comparisons(2324 points)Lacks epidemiological data and missing state or national comparisons(022 points)/30Windshield Survey20 pointsCommunity windshield survey findings adequately summarized and findings relate to identified problem(1820 points)Windshield survey findings adequately summarized but not clearly related to identified problem(16 points)Windshield survey findings not adequately summarized and not related to the problem (15 points)Windshield survey findings not described(014 points)/20Problem Diagnosis40 pointsAssessment data used to identify one priority community health problem, Healthy People 2020 specific objective included, and rationale for problem selection stated with supportive data (such as factors that contribute to this problem) from two scholarly articles(3740 points)Problem not related to Healthy People objective orlacks rationale with supportive data(3436 points)Problem not related to Healthy People objectiveand lacks rationale with supportive data(3033 points)Problem discussion missing(029 points)/40Application of Evidence-Based Scholarly Resources30 pointsTwo or more quality references from professional literature discussed with clear support of your problem rationale(2830 points)Two references discussed, but information does not clearly support problem rationale or references are not scholarly(2527 points)Only one reference discussed that is directly relevant to problem rationale(2324 points)No references discussed(022 points)/30Summary20 pointsSummary includes assessment and diagnosis findings, a brief statement about the problem, and factors that contribute to this problem(1820 points)Lacks reiteration of assessment findings or problem identification or contributing factors(17 points)Summary lacks two or more of:reiteration of assessment findings, problem identification, and contributing factors(16 points)Summary not completed(015 points)/20Presentation10 pointsDiscussion well organized and logical and structure is clear and compelling to reader; paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out(910 points)Discussion missing one of the organizational elements in column one and has some minor organizational concerns(8 points)Discussion missing two of the organizational elements in column one and overall flow is difficult to follow(7 points)Paper appears disorganized and is difficult to understand(06 points)/10Mechanics15 pointsExcellent mechanics with no more than two of the following errors:- correct grammar, spelling-complete sentences-all sources cited in the text-all references listed on the reference page and in APA format-title page in APA format-correct APA format of headings-12 point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins(14-15 points)Three mechanical or APA errors of elements listed in column one(13 points)Four mechanical or APA errorsof elements listed in column one(12 points)More than five mechanical or APA errors of elements listed in column one(011 points)/15Total Points:week 6Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 3:Intervention and EvaluationPurposeThe purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to provide an opportunity to develop a community health nursing intervention and evaluation tool for your identified community health problem (described in Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis) and identify the components of the nursing process as they apply to a community or population.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO1: Apply principles of nursing theory to the public health system by analyzing determinants of health and the public health intervention wheel. (PO 1)CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8)CO4: Evaluate the delivery of care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities based on theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1)Due DateSubmit your assignment to the appropriate basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 6.Points:250 pointsScenarioYou are a community public health nurse (C/PHN) working in your setting of choice. You have analyzed the data collected from your windshield survey and assessment and diagnosis assignments (the first two milestones) and identified one community health nursing problem. You have decided on one nursing intervention and need your organizations approval for funding of this intervention. Your leadership team has agreed to listen to your proposal.Directions Watch the Milestone 3 tutorialby clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/57f18443-dc92-4a70-8095-3cf3dc7338b5/1/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.zip/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 6 Assignments page. Choose a community health nurse setting. Some examples of settings are school nurse, parish nurse, home health nurse, nurse working in the health department (be specific to what area in the health department, e.g., WIC, STD clinic, health promotion, maternal-child health, etc.) Introduction: Introduce the identified problem, the purpose of the presentation, and reiterate at least one or two important findings that demonstrate this problem in your community (average of 12 slides) Proposed Intervention:Propose one community health nursing intervention that would address one or more of the major factors that contribute to the problem (average of 34 slides).o Describe your specific nursing intervention relating it to the public health intervention wheel (Nies & McEwen, 2015, p. 14, Figure 1-3)o Who is your target population?o Where is this intervention taking place?o Will it take place one time or multiple times?o How will you reach out to your target population? How will you get your target population involved?o What is the CH nurses role in this intervention?o Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physicians office, church, local resources, etc.)o Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)? If yes, are they paid or volunteers?o What level(s) of prevention is your intervention addressing (primary, secondary, or tertiary prevention)? Intervention Justification:Justify why the problem and your nursing intervention should be a priority.o Based on what you have found in the literature, discuss why these interventions are expected to be effective.o Include summarized information from at least two professional scholarly sources related to your intervention (average of 23 slides). Proposed Evaluation Methods: Your presentation must include at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method that youwould use to determine whether your intervention is effective. Outcome measurement is a crucial piece when implementing interventions (average of 23 slides)o Describe at least one quantitative or qualitative method you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective. (There is a helpful tool found in Doc Sharing to assist you with understanding qualitative and quantitative methods of evaluation).o Describe the desired outcomes you would track that would show whether your intervention was working.o Include a discussion about the long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is successful. Summary: The summary should reiterate the main points of the presentation and conclude with what you are asking to be accomplished; for example, Based on ABC, it is imperative our community has XYZ. Thank you for your consideration. In addition to the slides described above, your presentation should include a title slide with your name included and a reference slide. Remember, you are presenting to your leadership team, so the slides should include the most important elements for them to know in short bullet pointed phrases. You may add additional comments in the notes section to clarify information for your instructor.Guidelines Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 (or later). Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be no more than 20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide). Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: Milestone 3 Intervention and Evaluation by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6. Save the assignment with your last name in the file title: example: Smith Intervention and Evaluation. Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions. Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started.Best Practices in Preparing PowerPointThe following are best practices in preparing this project. Be creative but realistic with your intervention and evaluation tool. Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest. Slides should be easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Review directions thoroughly. Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the reference page. Proofread prior to final submission. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy.Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Intervention and Evaluation (250 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsProblem identification20 pointsPresentation includes at least one slide that introduces the problem and significant findings in the community(1820 points)Problem is introduced but lacks support with findings(17 points)Supportive findings discussed but problem identification not clear(16 points)Problem is not introduced and does not include community findings(015 points)/20Proposed intervention85 pointsOne community health nursing intervention is proposed that would address one or more of the major direct or indirect factors that contribute to the problem. Intervention includes specifics:*Where is this intervention taking place?*Will it take place one time or multiple times?*How will you reach your target population?*How will you involve your target population? Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physicians office, church, local resources, etc.)CHN role? Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)?*What level(s) of prevention are you addressing?*Community setting is clear.(7885 points)One intervention is proposed but is missing one or two specific details from column one(7177 points)Intervention is missing more than two specific details from column one(6570 points)Intervention is not proposed or does not address any details in column one(064 points)/85Intervention justification and application of evidence-based literature30 pointsIncludes at least one slide that discusses why this intervention should be a priority based on two scholarly findings.Two or more quality references from professional literature are cited that clearly support your rationale.(2830 points)Includes slide stating why the intervention should be a priority.Two references cited but information in the reference may be biased or not directly relevant to your rationale.(2527 points)Intervention justification inadequate or fewer than two references cited.(2324 points)Lacks slide on intervention justification. No references cited.(022 points)/30Evaluation70 pointsPresentation includes at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method and desired outcomes. Long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is successful discussed.(6470 points)At least one evaluation method adequately described but lacks discussion on long- and short-term impact on community(5963 points)Long and short term impact on community discussed, but evaluation method unclear(5362 points)Presentation lacks clear evaluation method and future impact(052 points)/70Summary20 pointsIncludes at least one summary slide that reiterates the problem and purpose of the presentation(1920 points)Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem or purpose(1718 points)Lacks reiteration of problem and purpose(1516 points)Summary slide not present(014 points)/20Overall presentation10 pointsPresentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.(910 points)Presentation is clear and organized but lacks creativity.(8 points)Presentation is somewhat disorganized and lacks creativity.(7 points)Presentation is disorganized and difficult to understand.(06 points)/10Mechanics15 pointsExcellent mechanics with no more than two errors of the following:- complete title slide- correct grammar, spelling- all sources cited in the text of slide- all references listed on the reference slide and in APA format (hanging indent not needed for PowerPoint)(1415 points)Three mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(13 points)Four mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(12 points)More than five mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(011 points)/15Total points:/250Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 1:Community Windshield SurveyPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to complete a direct observational assessment of a community in your area. This windshield survey will be the initial step in uncovering a community health problem in your area and identifying community dynamics. This problem will be further assessed in the following two assignments.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO2: Assess the health needs of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities using demographic and epidemiological data to identify population health risks. (PO 4)Due DateSubmit to the appropriate basket in the Dropboxby 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 2.Points:150 points1.Download the NR443 Community Windshield Survey form from Doc Sharing. You will type your name and answers directly onto this Word document. Your form does not need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use a professional writing style with complete sentences, accurate grammar, and correct spelling. If references are used, they must be cited in the text and the complete reference should be included in the reference box in APA format. References are optional.2.Watch Caring for Populations project overview and Milestone 1 tutorial by clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/18654d31-5a82-40bd-83fe-6e1cc86876e5/1/NR443_CH_CourseProject_Milestone_1_overview.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 2 Assignments page.3.Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name to the file name; for example, NR443 Windshield Survey Form_Smith.4.Submit the completed form to the Caring for Populations: Community Windshield Survey Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2.5.Length: The completed form should be three to four pages in length (not including any optional references).Below are the requirements needed for successful completion of the Windshield Survey Form.1.Introduction to the Community:Identify the community you will be using for this assignment with the city and state and provide a brief one paragraph description of the community. Your community should be the area where you live or the area surrounding your work setting. The community must include a residential area and be broad enough to answer the survey questions. You do not need demographic data.2.Windshield Survey: Assess your community by doing a windshield survey.Information about the components of a windshield survey is located in your textbook, Nies & McEwen (2015) on page 98 (Box 6-2). Drive through the area and report your observations by describing each of the following six areas using a majority of the questions from each category of Box 6-2 as your guide (one to two in depth paragraphs for each category). Be sure to include what you observed related to each of these categories, and also include any significant items that are missing in your community because this may be equally important in identifying a community health problem.a. Community vitalityb. Indicators of social and economic conditionsc. Health resourcesd. Environmental conditions related to healthe. Social functioningf. Attitude toward healthcareNote: It is helpful to conduct this assessment at least two different times: during the day or evening, on a weekday and/or on the weekend. If possible, plan on asking someone to drive during your survey so that you can take notes.3.Conclusion: Provide a summary of your findings. Describe significant community health problems based on your observations. The information gathered during the windshield survey should assist you to identify community health problems that will be further assessed in the next assignment.4.References: The purpose of this assignment is to document your observations of your community. Outside sources are not required. However, if sources are used, these sources must be cited within the form (Author, year) and listed in the reference section in APA format (see APA category in Course Resources for help with formatting).The following are best practices in preparing this project. Make sure all elements of the form are included. Review directions and grading rubric below thoroughly. Cite any outside references as above (these are optional). Use a professional writing style with complete sentences. Proofread prior to final submission. Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Community Windshield Survey (150 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor, failing, or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsIntroduction of Community20 pointsCommunity identified and briefly described(1820 points)Community identified but description is missing(1617 points)Community identification and description are insufficient(15 points)Community not identified or described(014 points)/20Windshield Survey100 pointsCommunity assessed: findings adequately cover the six criteria listed(92100 points)Assessment of 12 of the criteria is missing or inadequate(8491 points)Assessment of 34 of the criteria is missing or inadequate(7683 points)Windshield survey not completed or criteria not followed(075 points)/100Conclusion20 pointsConclusion sufficient and includes brief summary of windshield survey findings and identification of community health problems(1820 points)Conclusion lacks brief summary of findings orproblem identification(1617 points)Conclusion lacks brief summary and problem identification(15 points)Conclusion not completed(014 points)/20Mechanics10 pointsNo more than two grammar or spelling errors; writes logically in complete sentences(10 points)Three errors of any type(89 points)Four errors of any type(67 points)More than four errors of any type(05 points)/10Total Points:/150Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 2:Assessment and DiagnosisPurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an opportunity to utilize community assessment strategies, uncover a community health problem, and identify the components of one community health nursing problem related to the community dynamics.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO2: Assess the health needs of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities using demographic and epidemiological data to identify population health risks. (PO 4)CO6: Utilize a systems-based and collaborative approach to address factors that influence the health of a community and population health problems. (PO 2)Due DateSubmit to the appropriate basket in the Dropboxby 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 4.Points:225 pointsWatch the Milestone 2 tutorialby clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/57f18443-dc92-4a70-8095-3cf3dc7338b5/1/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.zip/NR443_CH_Milestone_2_tutorial.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 4 Assignments page.This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in length (not including the title page and reference list). Below are the requirements for successful completion of this paper. Please use the following categories as the first level headings on your paper. See the documents in the APA category in Course Resources for assistance with APA formatting. [Introduction:] This beginning of your paper should catch the readers attention with interesting facts about your community and shouldinclude the purpose statement of the paper. This should be one paragraph. APA states that you should not title this as introduction; however, you are still expected to write a separate introduction. The title of the paper should be repeated at the top of page two and centered. Community Overview: Identify the community that you are assessing by name and state and provide a general description of the community. What is the general character of the community? Statistics should not be included here. Your community should be the area you live or work in and should include a residential area. It should be a large enough area to answer the questions in the text. This should be one paragraph. Demographic Data: Compile a range of demographic (population description) data for your community by examining U.S. Census Bureau reports. Using this data, describe your community. Compare your community data to state or national data. A summary of this data should be no more than two paragraphs. Epidemiological Data: Compile and summarize a range of epidemiological (illness, morbidity, and mortality) data for your community by examining data from sources such as city or county health department reports, County Health Rankings (countyhealthrankings.org), or the Centers for Disease Control to describe priority health problems in your area. See the Webliography for applicable sites to search. Compare your community to state or national data. This comparison will help to identify a priority community health problem specific to your community. A summary of this data should be no more than two paragraphs. Windshield Survey: Provide a summary of your observations from your first milestone. Make sure to discuss observations related to your identified problem. This should be one to two paragraphs. Problem Diagnosis:o Using the assessment data, identify one community health nursing problem that you consider to be a priority concern.o Relate your choice to one of the Healthy People 2020 specific numbered objectives (not just a goal). Healthy People objectives are located within a topic area under the Objectives tab.o Your rationale should also include why this is a problem in your community and factors that contribute to the problem. Avoid discussion of interventions in this milestone.o Include a discussion of your problem with information from at least two scholarly sources (such as professional journal articles).(Review the documents in the APA category in Doc Sharing for help in determining sources that are considered scholarlyhint, .com websites are not considered scholarly sources). This should beno more than three paragraphs. Summary: Summarize your community assessment and diagnosis findings and include a brief statement about the problem and the major factors that contribute to this problem. This information should be no more than two paragraphs. Reference Page: All references should be cited within the paper and should be included on the reference page. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) to create this assignment. Use the categories above as APA headings for the sections of your paper. Length: This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in length (not including the title page and reference list). Submission: Submit your file via the basket in the Dropbox: Milestone 2 Assessment and Diagnosis, by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 4. Scholarly Writing: APA format is required. Review APA documents in the APA category in Course Resources and use the free resources of SmartThinking for writing tutors. Save your paper with your last name in the document title (e.g., Smith Assessment and Diagnosis). Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions.The following are best practices in preparing this project. Complete the demographic, epidemiologic, and windshield survey prior to choosing a problem to focus on. Choose one nursing problem specific to your community. Make sure all elements of the paper are addressed and headings for each category are included. Review directions thoroughly. Cite all sources within the paper as well as on the reference page. Proofread prior to final submission. Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Use the A column of the rubric below to ensure that you have included all the needed elements. Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy. The paper must be your original work. Once submitted to the Dropbox, check back to ensure that your Turnitin similarity index is less than 24%, if not revise and resubmit prior to the deadline.Grading Rubric: Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis (225 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsIntroduction10 pointsIncludes the purpose of the paper and catches the readers attention with interesting facts(910 points)Missing purpose of paper or hook(8 points)Missing purpose of paper and hook(7 points)Introduction missing(06 points)/10Community Overview20 pointsCommunity identified and adequately described(1820 points)Community identified but description is inadequate(16 points)Community identified but description is missing(15 points)Community not identified or described(014 points)/20Demographic Data30 pointsDescribes a range of demographic data about your community from U.S. Census Bureau reports with comparisons to state or national data(2830 points)Adequate demographic data described but missing state or national comparison(2527 points)Little demographic data and missing state or national comparisons(2324 points)Lacks demographic data and missing state or national comparisons(022 points)/30Epidemiological Data (Disease or health behavior rates)30 pointsDescribes a range of epidemiological data about community fromappropriate reports with comparisons to state or national data(2830 points)Adequate epidemiological data described but missing state or national comparison(2527 points)Little epidemiological data and missing state or national comparisons(2324 points)Lacks epidemiological data and missing state or national comparisons(022 points)/30Windshield Survey20 pointsCommunity windshield survey findings adequately summarized and findings relate to identified problem(1820 points)Windshield survey findings adequately summarized but not clearly related to identified problem(16 points)Windshield survey findings not adequately summarized and not related to the problem (15 points)Windshield survey findings not described(014 points)/20Problem Diagnosis40 pointsAssessment data used to identify one priority community health problem, Healthy People 2020 specific objective included, and rationale for problem selection stated with supportive data (such as factors that contribute to this problem) from two scholarly articles(3740 points)Problem not related to Healthy People objective orlacks rationale with supportive data(3436 points)Problem not related to Healthy People objectiveand lacks rationale with supportive data(3033 points)Problem discussion missing(029 points)/40Application of Evidence-Based Scholarly Resources30 pointsTwo or more quality references from professional literature discussed with clear support of your problem rationale(2830 points)Two references discussed, but information does not clearly support problem rationale or references are not scholarly(2527 points)Only one reference discussed that is directly relevant to problem rationale(2324 points)No references discussed(022 points)/30Summary20 pointsSummary includes assessment and diagnosis findings, a brief statement about the problem, and factors that contribute to this problem(1820 points)Lacks reiteration of assessment findings or problem identification or contributing factors(17 points)Summary lacks two or more of:reiteration of assessment findings, problem identification, and contributing factors(16 points)Summary not completed(015 points)/20Presentation10 pointsDiscussion well organized and logical and structure is clear and compelling to reader; paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out(910 points)Discussion missing one of the organizational elements in column one and has some minor organizational concerns(8 points)Discussion missing two of the organizational elements in column one and overall flow is difficult to follow(7 points)Paper appears disorganized and is difficult to understand(06 points)/10Mechanics15 pointsExcellent mechanics with no more than two of the following errors:- correct grammar, spelling-complete sentences-all sources cited in the text-all references listed on the reference page and in APA format-title page in APA format-correct APA format of headings-12 point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins(14-15 points)Three mechanical or APA errors of elements listed in column one(13 points)Four mechanical or APA errorsof elements listed in column one(12 points)More than five mechanical or APA errors of elements listed in column one(011 points)/15Total Points:Guidelines for Caring for Populations Milestone 3:Intervention and EvaluationPurposeThe purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to provide an opportunity to develop a community health nursing intervention and evaluation tool for your identified community health problem (described in Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis) and identify the components of the nursing process as they apply to a community or population.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO1: Apply principles of nursing theory to the public health system by analyzing determinants of health and the public health intervention wheel. (PO 1)CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8)CO4: Evaluate the delivery of care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities based on theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1)Due DateSubmit your assignment to the appropriate basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday of Week 6.Points:250 pointsScenarioYou are a community public health nurse (C/PHN) working in your setting of choice. You have analyzed the data collected from your windshield survey and assessment and diagnosis assignments (the first two milestones) and identified one community health nursing problem. You have decided on one nursing intervention and need your organizations approval for funding of this intervention. Your leadership team has agreed to listen to your proposal. Watch the Milestone 3 tutorialby clicking this.equella.ecollege.com/file/57f18443-dc92-4a70-8095-3cf3dc7338b5/1/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.zip/NR443_CH_Milestone_3_tutorial.mp4″>link. This tutorial is also available on Course Project page under Course Home as well as Week 6 Assignments page. Choose a community health nurse setting. Some examples of settings are school nurse, parish nurse, home health nurse, nurse working in the health department (be specific to what area in the health department, e.g., WIC, STD clinic, health promotion, maternal-child health, etc.) Introduction: Introduce the identified problem, the purpose of the presentation, and reiterate at least one or two important findings that demonstrate this problem in your community (average of 12 slides) Proposed Intervention:Propose one community health nursing intervention that would address one or more of the major factors that contribute to the problem (average of 34 slides).o Describe your specific nursing intervention relating it to the public health intervention wheel (Nies & McEwen, 2015, p. 14, Figure 1-3)o Who is your target population?o Where is this intervention taking place?o Will it take place one time or multiple times?o How will you reach out to your target population? How will you get your target population involved?o What is the CH nurses role in this intervention?o Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physicians office, church, local resources, etc.)o Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)? If yes, are they paid or volunteers?o What level(s) of prevention is your intervention addressing (primary, secondary, or tertiary prevention)? Intervention Justification:Justify why the problem and your nursing intervention should be a priority.o Based on what you have found in the literature, discuss why these interventions are expected to be effective.o Include summarized information from at least two professional scholarly sources related to your intervention (average of 23 slides). Proposed Evaluation Methods: Your presentation must include at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method that youwould use to determine whether your intervention is effective. Outcome measurement is a crucial piece when implementing interventions (average of 23 slides)o Describe at least one quantitative or qualitative method you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective. (There is a helpful tool found in Doc Sharing to assist you with understanding qualitative and quantitative methods of evaluation).o Describe the desired outcomes you would track that would show whether your intervention was working.o Include a discussion about the long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is successful. Summary: The summary should reiterate the main points of the presentation and conclude with what you are asking to be accomplished; for example, Based on ABC, it is imperative our community has XYZ. Thank you for your consideration. In addition to the slides described above, your presentation should include a title slide with your name included and a reference slide. Remember, you are presenting to your leadership team, so the slides should include the most important elements for them to know in short bullet pointed phrases. You may add additional comments in the notes section to clarify information for your instructor. Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 (or later). Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be no more than 20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide). Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: Milestone 3 Intervention and Evaluation by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6. Save the assignment with your last name in the file title: example: Smith Intervention and Evaluation. Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions. Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started.Best Practices in Preparing PowerPointThe following are best practices in preparing this project. Be creative but realistic with your intervention and evaluation tool. Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest. Slides should be easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Review directions thoroughly. Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the reference page. Proofread prior to final submission. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy.Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Intervention and Evaluation (250 points)CriteriaA(92100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceB(8491%)Very good or high level of performanceC(7683%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF(075%)Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performancePtsProblem identification20 pointsPresentation includes at least one slide that introduces the problem and significant findings in the community(1820 points)Problem is introduced but lacks support with findings(17 points)Supportive findings discussed but problem identification not clear(16 points)Problem is not introduced and does not include community findings(015 points)/20Proposed intervention85 pointsOne community health nursing intervention is proposed that would address one or more of the major direct or indirect factors that contribute to the problem. Intervention includes specifics:*Where is this intervention taking place?*Will it take place one time or multiple times?*How will you reach your target population?*How will you involve your target population? Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physicians office, church, local resources, etc.)CHN role? Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)?*What level(s) of prevention are you addressing?*Community setting is clear.(7885 points)One intervention is proposed but is missing one or two specific details from column one(7177 points)Intervention is missing more than two specific details from column one(6570 points)Intervention is not proposed or does not address any details in column one(064 points)/85Intervention justification and application of evidence-based literature30 pointsIncludes at least one slide that discusses why this intervention should be a priority based on two scholarly findings.Two or more quality references from professional literature are cited that clearly support your rationale.(2830 points)Includes slide stating why the intervention should be a priority.Two references cited but information in the reference may be biased or not directly relevant to your rationale.(2527 points)Intervention justification inadequate or fewer than two references cited.(2324 points)Lacks slide on intervention justification. No references cited.(022 points)/30Evaluation70 pointsPresentation includes at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method and desired outcomes. Long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is successful discussed.(6470 points)At least one evaluation method adequately described but lacks discussion on long- and short-term impact on community(5963 points)Long and short term impact on community discussed, but evaluation method unclear(5362 points)Presentation lacks clear evaluation method and future impact(052 points)/70Summary20 pointsIncludes at least one summary slide that reiterates the problem and purpose of the presentation(1920 points)Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem or purpose(1718 points)Lacks reiteration of problem and purpose(1516 points)Summary slide not present(014 points)/20Overall presentation10 pointsPresentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.(910 points)Presentation is clear and organized but lacks creativity.(8 points)Presentation is somewhat disorganized and lacks creativity.(7 points)Presentation is disorganized and difficult to understand.(06 points)/10Mechanics15 pointsExcellent mechanics with no more than two errors of the following:- complete title slide- correct grammar, spelling- all sources cited in the text of slide- all references listed on the reference slide and in APA format (hanging indent not needed for PowerPoint)(1415 points)Three mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(13 points)Four mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(12 points)More than five mechanical errors of elements listed in column one(011 points)/15Total points:/250

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply