Learning Activity #2 (LA #2)
Read the quantitative descriptive survey research study by Eldh, Vogel, Soderberg, Blomqvist, & Wengstrom Use of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines and Everyday Practice for Mechanical Ventilation in Swedish Intensive Care Units. Then complete a three to four page analysis and critique paper, 750 words. In this critique you will complete both the Synopsis and Credibility components from pages 419-420 of your textbook.
Evidence-Based Nursing The Research-Practice Connection (3rd Edition) (Required)
Sarah Jo Brown
Jones & Bartlett Learning, 01/15/2013
ISBN-13: 9781449697495 (Refer to pages 423426 to see a sample of a completed Appraisal).
Title your page with the following heading:
Learning Activity #2: Your Name and the Date
Appraisal of the Findings of a Descriptive Quantitative Study:
Citation: Eldh, A. C., Vogel, G., Soderberg, A., Blomqvist, H., & Wengstrom, Y. (2013). Use of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines and Everyday Practice for Mechanical Ventilation in Swedish Intensive Care Units. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 10(4), 198-207.
Use your own words to complete the critique Appraisal. In this critique you will complete both the Synopsis and Credibility components from pages 419-420 of your textbook. Do all the components for Synopsis as done in LA#1. Then do all the components for Credibility. Copy each of the following questions (with number) and then answer each question.
1.What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)?
2.How was the sample obtained?
3.What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used?
4.Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data?
5.What methods were used to collect data (e,g., sequence of events, timing, types of data, and measures)?
6.Was an intervention/treatment/clinical protocol tested? Yes ___ No ___
7.What were the main findings of this study?
8.Is the study published in peer-reviewed journal? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___. If yes, how did you find out this information?
9.Was the research/experimental design used in this study appropriate for the research question? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___
10.Did the data obtained and the data analysis that was conducted answer the research question? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___
11.Were the measuring instruments used in this study reliable and valid? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___. How do you know this?
12.Were important extraneous variables and potential bias controlled for in this study? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___
13.Was the study free of extraneous variables introduced by how, when, and where the study was done? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___
14.Are the findings consistent with or different from previous findings from other studies in this area of study? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___
15.Are the study findings credible? All Yes ___ Some Yes ___ No ___
16.Conclude your paper by stating whether you agree or disagree with the Implications for practice and research section in the study, or are there other ideas/research areas that should be addressed? Do you think the study findings would be different if the study was conducted with nurses in the USA, or do you think the findings would be very similar? Compare the study findings to your own clinical practice experience in relation to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines. In your own experience, do you find the results from the Swedish nurses to be similar to what happens in your own USA-based clinical practice setting?